I know, it's not quite Christmas yet but I couldn't resist the photo opportunity....
Snowflake recently released an excellent guide on AI agents. It’s one of the clearest explanations yet of how autonomous systems will evolve from passive chat interfaces into active, context-aware assistants that can sense, reason, plan, act, and learn.
Their perspective is spot on — and it resonates strongly with what we’re seeing every day with capital project teams, engineering organizations, and the broader industrial sector.
But as I read the guide, one insight became impossible to ignore:
The greatest impact of AI agents won’t be in generating more content. It will be in coordinating complex, high-stakes work where decisions ripple across teams, disciplines, and deliverables.
This is the frontier Snowflake hints at — and it’s the domain where Optimality is already operating.
Why AI Agents Are the Next Major Shift in Enterprise Operations
Snowflake highlights three core capabilities that will define the next generation of AI agents:
1. They operate on structured + unstructured context
AI agents are only as good as the environment they work within. The quality, governance, and structure of data — not just the model — determine the value they can deliver.
2. They perform multi-step tasks, not just single answers
This marks the shift from chatbots to do-bots. Enterprises aren’t asking for summaries; they’re asking for outcomes.
3. They work together, each with a specific role
No single agent will cover an entire organization. The future is a network of domain-specific agents, each operating inside well-defined boundaries.
These ideas are foundational to what Snowflake describes — and they’re exactly the patterns we’re seeing in engineering and capital projects.
Where Snowflake’s View Meets Reality in Capital Projects
Capital projects are, in many ways, the ultimate testbed for AI agents:
- Deliverables evolve daily
- Engineering changes create cascading impacts
- Multiple contractors and disciplines must remain aligned
- Schedules slip when downstream effects go undetected
- Rework is chronic but rarely visible until late
These environments need more than data agents. They need AI that understands work — not just documents.
That’s where Optimality fits.
How We’re Applying These Principles at Optimality
At Optimality, our core system — Flow — structures work into activities, dependencies, deliverables, versions, commitments, and ownership. This foundation becomes visible and actionable through the Activity Flow Diagram (AFD), which gives teams a shared, logic-driven picture of the work.
This is the context Snowflake rightly says is essential for agents to perform well.
Once this structure exists, AI agents can finally do meaningful work. Our Optimizers operate directly inside Flow and the AFD, where they can:
- Turn meeting transcripts into linked tasks
- Detect changes across drawings, specs, and deliverables
- Flag downstream impacts across disciplines
- Highlight readiness risks and bottlenecks
- Suggest updates when the plan diverges from reality
- Match documents to the activities they support
These are not hypothetical use cases — they’re live today or deploying over the next two quarters.
This is the shift from information agents to coordination agents.
Why Domain-Specific Agents Will Win
Snowflake’s guide is clear: accuracy, governance, and structure matter. But in environments like capital projects, agents need more than clean data. They need embedded logic about how the work actually unfolds.
A generic LLM can summarize a P&ID. It cannot understand:
- how that change affects I&C
- which activities depend on a spec revision
- what becomes blocked if a deliverable slips
- how a work package aligns with discipline handoffs
Flow + AFD give Optimizers this context. It becomes the substrate for AI, enabling agents to reason about dependencies, constraints, readiness, and change — exactly the kind of multi-step capability Snowflake describes at the enterprise level.
What’s Next: From AI Awareness to AI-Driven Execution
Across the organizations we work with — owners, EPCs, engineering teams — we see the same trajectory:
- Teams want traceability, not more tools
- They want changes flagged before issues emerge
- They want meetings translated into action — automatically
- They want deliverables linked to the work they actually support
- And they want AI that fits the way they deliver projects
Snowflake’s guide reflects a growing industry understanding that AI agents will become embedded in daily operations, not as side-channel assistants but as active participants in work.
For capital projects, this shift will be even more profound. These are environments with tightly coupled dependencies, immense information flow, and high cost of misalignment.
This is where agentic AI will deliver its biggest returns.
And it’s exactly the future we’re building toward at Optimality — where Flow provides the structure, the AFD provides the shared view, and Optimizers provide the intelligence that keeps teams aligned.
A Final Thought
Snowflake’s guide is a great signal that the market is finally catching up to what many of us have been feeling: AI’s next breakthrough won’t be in generating text — it will be in generating alignment.
Capital projects have always struggled with fragmentation and rework. AI agents won’t replace people, but they will relieve them of the noise, the duplication, and the blind spots that slow delivery.
At Optimality, we’re excited to be building this future — one where AI doesn’t just answer questions, but helps teams deliver complex work with clarity, confidence, and consistency.